WTO Public Symposium 2003: Parliaments and the WTO
Organized by the IPU
Inter-Parliamentary
Union Report on the session
The IPU and the WTO organized a specific panel session on the role
of parliamentarians within the WTO. Dr. Supachai opened the
meeting by explaining the many efforts the WTO has made to involve parliamentarians, mentioning the meeting that is planned to be held in Cancun with the IPU
only days before the ministerial. Well attended by members of parliament
from all over the world, the debate was both constructive and lively.
Debate Themes
Growing threats to multilateralism: Should
parliaments be concerned?
One of the themes of this discussion were the current threats
to multilateralism. Proliferating free trade agreements was one problem
returned to again and again. The Director-General used the term "messy" to
describe the amount of FTAs, both bilateral and regional. With 270 currently
notified to the WTO, multilateralism is undermined because of the many
preferential treatment clauses involved in these FTAs. The second type of
threat that came up was decidedly less diplomatic. Many of the panelists, as
well as members of Parliament in the audience brought up the image problem,
mostly a feeling of mistrust and discomfort with the trade system, that the WTO
has suffered from since the Seattle Ministerial.
The resounding feeling concerning this troubling trend was that, yes,
parliaments should be concerned. With the increased interconnectedness of the
modern global economy countries have to, more and more, rely on each other.
There is no other alternative for many small economies, except for a dependence
on a multilateral rule based system. Collective action through multilateral
trade is the most promising method of reviving the slow state of growth
worldwide.
Missed deadlines in the Doha Round: How can
parliaments help advance the negotiations?
Parliaments, as elected representatives of their country's
people, have a unique position in supporting the WTOs negotiations. The most
important aspect of this role is that of communicator. Given their elected
status, the opinion of parliamentarians carries extra weight. If the
Parliaments of member countries can explain to the masses how important
successful negotiation through the WTO is, then the public pressure necessary
to have trade ministers willing to negotiate ("give and take") may be achieved.
There was an overwhelming feeling throughout the discussion, that if
parliamentarians put in effort to help their public have a clear and balanced
picture of the WTO, many gains can be made and missed deadlines can be
recovered.
Panelists
Welcome by WTO Director-General
Dr. Supachai Panitchpakdi
Moderator: Mr. Geert Versnick, MP (Belgium)
Mr. John Dupraz, MP (Switzerland)
Mr. Michel Hansenne, member of the
European Parliament
Mr. Ricardo Melendez-Ortiz, Executive Director of the
ICTSD
|